-Photoroom.png)
Navigate Patent Examination to Secure Successful Grants
Has your patent application been challenged by examiner objections? Facing complex office actions that threaten your innovation's protection? Our Patent Prosecution and Grant Support service provides expert guidance throughout the examination process, turning potential rejections into successful patent grants.
From responding to technical objections to strategic claim amendments, we help innovators, legal teams, and companies navigate the challenging examination phase across major patent offices worldwide.
Why Expert Prosecution Support Matters:
- Transform examiner rejections into approved patents
- Preserve maximum protection scope during examination
- Navigate complex technical and legal objections effectively
- Secure stronger, more defensible granted patents
- Reduce examination timelines and associated costs
Our Comprehensive Prosecution Approach
Strategic Office Action Analysis
We begin with a thorough assessment of examiner objections, identifying underlying issues and developing response strategies tailored to the specific patent office requirements.
Persuasive Technical Arguments
Our prosecution specialists craft compelling responses that address examiner concerns with clear technical explanations customized for each jurisdiction's unique requirements.
Strategic Claim Amendments
When necessary, we develop strategic claim amendments that overcome objections while preserving essential protection scope, carefully considering each patent office's claim construction standards.
Examiner Interviews and Hearings
We conduct productive discussions with patent examiners to clarify misunderstandings and negotiate effective resolution paths according to each office's procedures.
Pre-Grant Documentation
We handle all pre-grant formalities according to jurisdiction-specific requirements.
Post-Grant Support
After successful grant, we provide guidance on next steps based on the specific patent office's post-grant processes.
Key Prosecution Challenges By Jurisdiction
Indian Patent Office (IPO) Challenges
Section 3(k) Subject Matter Issues We highlight hardware integration and technical effects to overcome computer-related invention objections under India's unique subject matter restrictions.
Section 10 Sufficiency Objections Our responses address the IPO's specific requirements for disclosure completeness while maintaining appropriate claim scope.
Controller Hearings We provide expert representation at in-person and video hearings before Indian Controllers, a unique aspect of the Indian patent system.
Form 27 Working RequirementsWe manage India's specific patent working statement requirements that don't exist in other jurisdictions.
United States Patent Office (USPTO) Challenges
35 USC §101 Eligibility Rejections Our responses navigate the unique US framework for subject matter eligibility, particularly for software inventions.
35 USC §112 Indefiniteness RejectionsWe resolve claim clarity challenges through precise language refinements that satisfy US examiners' specific requirements while maintaining broad protection.
Continuation StrategyWe develop USPTO-specific continuation application strategies to maximize protection, utilizing a feature unique to the US patent system.
Who Benefits from Our Prosecution Expertise
- Patent Applicants facing challenging office actions
- Legal Teams requiring technical prosecution support
- R&D Organizations seeking to maximize protection for innovations
- Law Firms needing specialized prosecution capabilities in specific jurisdictions
- Companieswith pending applications needing expert management
Don't let examiner objections diminish your innovation's protection. Our strategic prosecution services transform challenging office actions into granted patents with optimal protection scope.
Ready to overcome patent examination challenges? [Get Prosecution Support]
"Their prosecution strategy was brilliant. After receiving a particularly difficult office action, their team developed a response that not only overcame the rejections but actually strengthened our patent position. They have an exceptional ability to combine technical understanding with persuasive legal arguments." — Dr. Subha Narayan, Professor at US University
